The Job Seeker Silver Medal: When “Internal Candidate” Becomes the Final Insult
- 7 days ago
- 1 min read

“We’ve decided to proceed with the internal candidate.”
After 40+ hours of preparation.
Six rounds.
Weeks of emotional investment.
Let’s pause on that.
40 hours.
A full working week.
Unpaid. Gone.
Time that helped the employer:
• validate their internal candidate
• benchmark the market
So here’s the question:
At what point does hiring stop being evaluation…
and start becoming extraction of value from candidates?
John didn’t just miss out.
He got the silver medal in a race that was never fair.
And the feedback session?
Promised.
Still postponed.
Let’s call it.
This isn’t just frustrating.
It’s disrespectful.
So let’s ask:
• Why introduce internal candidates at stage five?
• Why run full external processes with a likely internal outcome?
• How often are roles just testing the market?
Because right now…
there’s no accountability.
To every hiring manager running processes like this:
How would you feel if it was you?
If you’ve experienced this…
I want to hear from you.
Drop a comment, share your story, or just say “silver medal” - let’s surface how common this really is.
TC 💛




Comments